Plandemic

“Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decades-longmoney trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID -19 pandemic. Plandemic II connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.”

Pland3micIndoctornation  

“…the most viewed and banned documentory of all time.”

Part 1: interview with Dr. Judy Mikovits, the highly-qualified molecular biologist whose groundbreaking work and her book, Plague of Corruption: Restoring the Promise of Science, resulted in her losing her grants, being arrested without charge and jailed without charge–she “lost everything” but continues to speak out.

The film, based on her work and that of many other scientists–including a Nobel Laureate–exposes the abuse of scientific method in justifying the genocidal lockdown. The film went viral when first released–then deleted from, and/or ridiculed on, every social media site. Still is, as you can see if you google her name, or the name ‘Plandemic’.

Freedom Platform is an independent people-powered site that allows you to WATCH and/or DOWNLOAD this explosive, mind-expanding, holistic view of our current manufactured crisis, based on the best science: the “political virus”.

(Professor Michel Chossudovsky’s term: http://www.globalresearch.ca/video-covid-gate-the-political-virus/5722504.)

Advertisement

The Whole of Europe Turned Into a Battlefield

vvBy Manlio Dinucci

Global Research, January 22, 2023

Region: EuropeRussia and FSU

Theme: Militarization and WMDUS NATO War Agenda

In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

The Federation of American Scientists confirms in January the news given by Grandangolo in December 2022 based on a U.S. Air Force document: the C-17A Globemaster aircraft has been authorized to carry the U.S. B61-12 nuclear bomb to Italy and other European countries. Since Biden Administration officials had announced that the B61-12 shipment would be brought forward to December, we believe that the new US nuclear bombs are already arriving in Europe to be deployed against Russia.

The U.S. and NATO are pouring into Ukraine huge amounts of heavy artillery munitions supplied to the Kiev armed forces. The U.S.-according to official figures-has so far sent more than one million rounds of ammunition for 155 mm howitzers to Ukraine, plus tens of thousands of missiles. About 300,000 rounds of ammunition come from U.S. military depots in Israel. The arms shipment is managed by an international network, in which Camp Darby- the largest U.S. arsenal outside the motherland, connected to the port of Livorno and Pisa military airport – plays a central role. Britain, France, Poland and Finland are supplying Kiev with tanks, and Poland is purchasing Abrams tanks from the U.S. Some of which may be destined for Ukraine.

At the same time, the U.S. and NATO are enhancing the deployment of their forces in Europe, increasingly close to Russia. In Romania, NATO deployed AWACS aircraft, equipped with the most sophisticated electronic equipment, kept constantly in flight near Russian airspace. Also in Romania, the Pentagon deployed the 101st Airborne Division, which is being deployed to Europe for the first time since World War II.

NATO and the EU establish “a task force on resilience and critical infrastructure.” “NATO,” declares the Council of the European Union, “remains the foundation of our collective defense. We recognize the value of a stronger European Defense that contributes to transatlantic security and is complementary and interoperable with NATO.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

This article was originally published on byoblu.

Manlio Dinucci, award winning author, geopolitical analyst and geographer, Pisa, Italy. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Manlio Dinucci, Global Research, 2023


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Related Articles from our Archives

The C-17A Has Been Cleared to Transport B61-12 Nuclear Bomb to Europe13 January 2023

The B61-12 Mini-nukes “Made in America” to be Used in “A Nuclear First Strike”. Coming Soon to Italy, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands.27 August 2022

The “Globe Master” Brings Us Nuclear Bombs2 January 2023


Beyond Vietnam to Ukraine

By Rick Sterling

Global Research, January 16, 2023

Region: AsiaEurope

Theme: HistoryLaw and JusticeUS NATO War Agenda

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

In April 1967,  Martin Luther King Jr. delivered an eloquent and stirring denunciation of the Vietnam war and US militarism. The speech titled “Beyond Vietnam” is relevant to today’s war in Ukraine. 

In the speech at Riverside Church, King talked about how the US had supported France in trying to re-colonize Vietnam. He noted, “Before the end of the war we were meeting 80% of the French war costs.”

Click here to access complete text and audio

When France began to despair in the war, “We encouraged them with our huge financial and military supplies to continue the war.”


King went on to recall that after the French finally left Vietnam, the United States prevented the implementation of the Geneva Accord which would have allowed Ho Chi Minh to unite the divided country. Instead, the US supported its preferred South Vietnamese dictator.

The U.S. has played a similar role in blocking compromise solutions and international agreements to the Ukraine conflict.

Following Ukraine protests in February 2014, the European Union negotiated an agreement between President Yanukovich and the opposition to have early new elections. The attitude of lead US official Victoria Nuland was crystallized in her secretly recorded comment,  “F*** the EU!”  Despite the agreement, a violent bloody coup led by ultra-nationalist Ukrainians was “midwifed”.

The ultra-nationalist coup government immediately started implementing policies hostile to the Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine. The coup and the new policies provoked the conflicts and resistance which have led to the situation today. The coup and policies were abhorred by a majority of Ukrainians, especially in eastern Ukraine.  The Russian speaking Ukrainian citizens of Crimea voted overwhelmingly to secede from Ukraine and re-unify with Russia.

The Minsk Accords of 2014 and 2015 were intended to resolve the conflict by granting some autonomy to the the Russian speaking sections in the eastern Donbass but keeping them within Ukraine.  Thanks to the admissions of two prominent former European leaders, Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande, we know that the West and their Ukrainian government puppet never intended to implement the Minsk Agreement.

Like the 1954 Geneva Accords regarding Vietnam, the 2014 and 2015 Minsk Agreements on Ukraine were never implemented because Washington did not want a compromise.

When Ukraine President Zelensky had negotiations with Russians in Turkey at the end of March 2022, UK PM Boris Johnson hurried to Kyiv to dissuade Zelensky from continuing serious negotiations to end the war.

Similarly, the US is providing the big majority of  weapons, military supplies and financial aid to Ukraine just as they did to France and then the puppet government of South Vietnam. And similarly the US and allies do not want a resolution to the conflict which might in any way be seen as win for Russia.

Rationalization vs Reality of  Wars in Vietnam and Ukraine

In April 1965, U.S. President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) explained why he was escalating US involvement in Vietnam. With an Orwellian touch, he titled the speech “Peace without Conquest” as he announced the beginning of US air attacks on Vietnam.  He explained that

“We must fight if we are to live in a world where every country can shape its own destiny and only in such a world will our own freedom be secure… we have made a national pledge to help South Vietnam defend its independence and I intend to keep that promise. To dishonor that pledge, to abandon the small and brave nation to its enemies and the terror must follow would be an unforgivable wrong…We are also there to strengthen world order… To leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people in the value of an American commitment and in the value of America’s words.”

Click Link to access video and audio of LBJ’s John Hopkins Speech

President Biden and administration leaders  sound similar to LBJ  in the early stage of the Vietnam War. In his remarks to Congress asking for additional funding for Ukraine, Biden said,

“We need this bill to support Ukraine in its fight for freedom…. The cost of this fight is not cheap, but caving to aggression is going to be more costly if we allow it to happen…Investing in Ukraine’s freedom and security is a small price to pay to punish Russian aggression, to lessen the risk of future conflicts.”

Both Russia and the US now acknowledge that the conflict in Ukraine is between Russia and NATO (led the US). Ukraine is a proxy for the US which promoted the 2014 coup and has been pumping weapons into Ukraine ever since. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has been explicit: “We want to see Russia weakened.” The Ukrainian Defense Chief says they are fighting “to fulfill NATO’s mission.”

These wars are unnecessary

Just as the US could have lived with Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh leadership without the war, the US could live with Ukraine being a neutral country and bridge between east and west, Russia and western Europe.

However, as ML King observed 54 years ago, that was not (and still is not)  US policy.

“The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit.” He went on to name many other countries which are victims of  US intervention and aggression. He said, “And if we ignore this sobering reality we will find ourselves … marching …and attending rallies without end unless there is a significant and profound change in American life and policy. Such thoughts take us beyond Vietnam…”

Incrementally Increasing Conflict toward Total War

In 1965, when President Johnson announced the beginning of US air attacks on Vietnam, the war had been going on for many years.  The US kept incrementally increasing its commitment – from political support to advisors and trainers and special operations. In spring 1965 “only” about 400 US soldiers had died in the conflict. The war was not yet  widely unpopular. Americans who protested against the Vietnam War were a small minority.

We may be at a similar or earlier point in the conflict with Russia via Ukraine. While many tens of BILLIONS of dollars has been committed to Ukraine, plus advisors, trainers and other support, the US military has not yet been openly and actively deployed.

The incremental buildup in Vietnam ultimately led to over 58,000 Americans and three million Vietnamese civilians and soldiers being killed.  US prestige and influence was severely damaged.

Martin Luther King Jr said in his 1967 speech [exactly two years after LBG hi,

“We have no honorable intentions in Vietnam …. The world demands a maturity of America that we may not be able to achieve. It demands that we admit that we have been wrong from the beginning of our adventure in Vietnam, that we have been detrimental to the life of the Vietnamese people.”

If the incremental buildup toward war with Russia is not stopped, it will be immeasurably worse than Vietnam. Already we are seeing tremendous destruction with Ukrainians and Russians dying by the thousands.  As with Vietnam in 1965, this could be just the beginning.

The costs of war and militarism

Dr King described the negative impact of the Vietnam war at home. He said

“A few years ago there was a shining moment …. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the Poverty Program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the build-up in Vietnam and I watched this program broken and eviscerated … I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.”

Today, with nearly 60% of the federal discretionary budget going to the military, so called intelligence and nuclear weapon modernization, the situation is even more stark.  While US infrastructure corrodes, homelessness, personal debt, suicides and addictions increase. Instead of spending resources improving the lives of ordinary people, the government is pouring borrowed billions into another unnecessary war.

Western Media Distortions

Western media portrayed  the US and South Vietnam winning the war in South East Asia until the 1968 Tet offensive exposed the lies and reality. Similarly,  western media portrays Ukrainians winning the war midst overwhelming Ukrainian public support. In reality, Russia and the  secessionist areas control large areas and will advance in the near future. Ukrainian losses are already huge.

The idea that all Ukrainians love the West and hate Russia is false. As an indication of the  mixed sentiments, the country having received the MOST emigrants from Ukraine is Russia. While a small number continue from Russia to west European countries, the big majority stay in Russia with many awaiting the end of warfare.

Just as South Vietnamese puppet leaders were built up the US for political reasons, so is Ukrainian President Zelensky. His speeches are written by Washington insiders. Largely censored from the media, Zelensky has overseen the imprisonment, torture and killing of opponents. The largest opposition party has been banned.  Many Ukrainians oppose his policy and continuation of the war.

Ukrainians have become cannon fodder for the US geopolitical goals, just as the South Vietnamese were.

Will the US and allies continue to escalate the conflict in Ukraine, to “double down” on an intervention half way around the world with the goal of hurting Russia? Have we learned nothing from Vietnam and subsequent US/Western foreign policy disasters of the past 40 years?

ML King’s Hopes and Death

In his profound speech, Dr King said:

“We as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values…When machines and computer, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered… A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death …..The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just… Our only hope today lies in our ability to recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out in a sometimes hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism and militarism.”

Exactly one year after delivering the speech at Riverside Church, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was assassinated. 

The Vietnam war continued for another seven years until the Vietnamese finally defeated and expelled the US military and their puppets. The disaster of the Vietnam War will be small compared to the disaster which may befall us all if US policy of attacking Russia through Ukraine is not stopped.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Rick Sterling is an independent journalist based in the SF Bay Area. He can contacted at rsterling1@protonmail.com. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Featured image: U.S. tanks use flamethrowers in a field during the Vietnam War in 1970. /CFP

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Rick Sterling, Global Research, 2023


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Related Articles from our Archives

The Dangers of Military Escalation: Lessons from Vietnam for Ukraine28 July 2022

Joe Biden’s Demand of ‘Unconditional Surrender’ to Russia Will Fail30 August 2022

The Pentagon’s “Ides of March”: Best Month to Go to War?6 March 2022


Articles by:Rick Sterling

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

Covid an act of war

https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-bombshell-docs-reveal-covid-19-cover-up-goes-straight-to-the-top-redacted-with-clayton-morris/5804015?pdf=5804015


465,034 views Jan 7, 2023A BOMBSHELL new report by Sasha Latipova, FRMR Pharmaceutical Executive and Lead Researcher, shows that the Department of Defense – meaning the Pentagon – controlled the COVID-19 Program from the very beginning. If true, it means that everything we were told was political theater, right down to the FDA vaccine approval process. Our guest today is the former executive of a pharmaceutical contract research organization Sasha Latypova and she shows what she has found due to her searches based on instinct that the Covid vaccine was not exactly on the up and up.

Grandson of Charles de Gaulle, an Old CIA Nemesis, Condemns West’s Policy in Ukraine

https://www.globalresearch.ca/grandson-charles-de-gaulle-old-cia-nemesis-condemns-west-policy-ukraine/5804286

Says the U.S. and NATO triggered the conflict and are making Europeans suffer

By Jeremy Kuzmarov

Global Research, January 11, 2023

CovertAction Magazine

Region: EuropeRussia and FSUUSA

Theme: Intelligence

In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT

Pierre de Gaulle, a grandson of former French President Charles de Gaulle, has said the U.S. is making Europeans suffer by fueling the Ukraine conflict and waging a pre-planned economic war against Russia.

A corporate consultant and bank manager, Pierre told The Franco-Russian Dialogue Association on December 26:

“I revolt and protest this intellectual dishonesty in the Ukraine crisis because the triggers of the war are the Americans and NATO. The United States unfortunately continues the military escalation, making not only the Ukrainian population suffer, but the European population as well.”

Pierre continued:

“The scale and the number of sanctions show that all of this was organized a long time in advance. It is an economic war, from which the Americans are the beneficiaries. The Americans sell their gas to Europeans for a price four to seven times higher than they do in their own country.”

According to Pierre,

“public opinion in France is beginning to understand what the evil game of the Americans is today. By using lies, . . .the United States has managed to use the Ukrainian crisis to destabilize Europe. The Americans, as it were, cut off Europe from Russia, set the Europeans against the Russians. Why would they do that? Because Europe in alliance with Russia could be a strong bloc both politically and economically, culturally and socially…Ever since the Vietnam War and the economic crises that followed, Americans have always tried by force, cunning and other dishonest means to make up for the loss of their economic and political influence, although it is inevitable. In particular, Americans are trying to slow down the dollar’s loss of its status as the only…world exchange currency. And this policy continues.”

Target of the CIA

Charles de Gaulle was a hero of the French resistance against the Nazi occupation during World War II who went on to serve as French president from 1959 to 1969.

The CIA has declassified documents revealing that the Agency was involved in a plot in 1965 to kill de Gaulle, who had angered the Johnson administration by opposing the Vietnam War and throwing U.S. servicemen off French military bases.

De Gaulle had also pursued a progressive policy toward the Soviet Union, withdrawing French forces from NATO in 1966 and opening up negotiations with Soviet leaders, visiting Moscow numerous times and signing a trade agreement with the Soviets.

After a failed assassination attempt in 1961, right-wing military officers who hated de Gaulle for relinquishing French control over Algeria, approached the CIA and developed an assassination plot that involved infiltrating an agent wearing a poisoned ring into a group of old soldiers attending a reception at which de Gaulle would appear.

When de Gaulle gestured to shake his hand, the general would fall to the ground while the assassin strolled calmly off into the crowd.

Restoring Grandpa Charles’s Vision

In a speech on the national day of the Russian Federation in June at the Russian embassy in Paris, Pierre de Gaulle noted how Russia had been seen by his grandfather as an indispensable ally whose friendship would contribute to the stability of Europe.

“The General [his grandfather] even said ‘Napoleon’s disastrous decision to attack [Czar] Alexander I is the biggest mistake he ever made. Nothing forced him to do so. It was contrary to our interests, to our traditions, to our genius. It is from the war between Napoleon and the Russians that our decadence dates.’”

France’s greatest folly: Napoleon’s army retreating in the Russian snow. [Source: kanopy.com]

Emphasizing how the Russian and French people were linked together “by long years of friendship and by the blood shed against the Nazis,” Pierre stated that he had come here to “affirm once again, loud and clear, that it is in France’s interest to maintain good relations with Russia and to say that we must work together in order to help the union and security of our continent, as well as the balance, progress, and peace of the entire world.”

In Pierre’s view, the “systematic and blind policy of confiscation and discrimination directed against the entire Russian people” [reference to sanctions] was “scandalous.” French elites had betrayed his grandfather’s legacy by siding with the U.S. and NATO and the “reckless” and “condemnable policy of the Ukrainian government towards the Russian-speaking population of Donbas, [which involved] discrimination, plundering, embargoes and bombings.”

The West, according to Pierre, has “allowed Zelensky, his oligarchs and the neo-Nazi military groups to be trapped in a spiral of war,” with their “blindness having serious consequences for the Ukrainian people. But let’s make no mistake. What do the Americans want, if not to provoke a new East-West confrontation, whose only goal is to weaken and divide Europe in order to impose their directive, their economy, and their system.”

Pierre further noted that the Americans have “never accepted, nor the West with them, that after the difficult transition of 1991 and the reconstruction that followed, Russia would not fit into their unipolar world…nor that Russia should transform itself according to the Western model—in its own way. Because of this, and from the beginning, President Putin was perceived as a dictator, whereas he is a great leader for his country!”

The United States, Pierre continued, “has also never accepted the loss of the role of the dollar as the dominant currency in the settlement of international trade in the world.”

Pierre’s words are heretical to American ears and those of the French ruling elite; however, they present a wonderful and realistic vision that progressive movements should embrace.

Pierre ended his speech by noting that his grandfather loved Russia and “always supported and defended the imperative need, even in the most difficult moments of history, to build and preserve a strong and shared relationship with Russia. Allow me to quote General de Gaulle once again: ‘In France, we have never considered Russia an enemy. I am for the development of Franco-Russian friendship; and I have never sent and I will never send arms to people who would have fought against Soviet Russia.’”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Jeremy Kuzmarov is Managing Editor of CovertAction Magazine. He is the author of four books on U.S. foreign policy, including Obama’s Unending Wars (Clarity Press, 2019) and The Russians Are Coming, Again, with John Marciano (Monthly Review Press, 2018). He can be reached at: jkuzmarov2@gmail.com.

Graphene COVID Kill Shots: Let the Evidence Speak for Itself

By Dr. Ariyana LoveGlobal Research, December 05, 2021

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

I compiled all the evidence we have into this article that prove Graphene Oxide, Graphene Hydroxide and other Graphene variants are in fact being injected into people by governments and Big Pharma.

This evidence was discovered and proven numerous times already by independent research teams, scientists, Biotech whistleblowers and the few ethical Journalists remaining.

There’s a concerted effort by the pharmaceutical cartel funded “fact checkers,” Big Tech platforms and mainstream media, to hide the evidence and slander the people bringing this to light.

Once you go over the evidence provided here, you must take action for the safety of you and your families.

Serve all war criminals participating in this COVID death jab program with a Notice of Liability for the murders they are committing.

This is definitive action that any person can take, worldwide.

The notices are already drafted by legal teams so why not use them and let our enemies be on the defensive. The criminals will be reminded of the Nuremberg trials, and informed that they will be brought to justice. They need to cease and desist from acting knowingly and willfully in mandating “vaccine” death jabs and enforcing them. The evidence to the danger is clear and deaths have been proven. Anyone administering or mandating these “vaccine” kill shots are doing so without Informed Consent.

Compilation of Evidence

On November 2nd, a prominent Professor at the University of Almeria, Dr. Pablo Camprarevealed his detection of Graphene in multiple Covid-19 “vaccine” vials, using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. The Dr. Campra’s University of Almeria report demonstrated the detection of Graphene and Graphene Oxide in 8 samples from various “vaccine” manufacturers.

In response, Dr. Andreas Noack released a scathing video commenting on Dr. Campra’s report. Dr. Noack is a chemist and the world’s leading expert in activated carbon engineering and GRAPHENE. Dr. Noack did his PhD doctoral thesis on how to turn Graphene Oxide into Graphene Hydroxide.

The video is of crucial importance. Dr. Noack said that two of the frequency bands that Dr. Campra detected were of Graphene HydroxideGraphene Hydroxide (GHO) is a mono-layer activated carbon, 50nm long and 0.1nm thick (an atom layer thick). Thus, the injections contain nano-razorblades of exceptional stability, which are non-biodegrable (a fact that every chemist knows).

In effect, these nano-razorblades cut up and destroy the heart, brain and cardiovascular system. The epithelial cells become rough so things stick to them. He says that toxicologists cannot find them in a petri dish by normal methods as they do not move and they don’t expect to discover nano-sized razor blades. Moreover, any doctor who injects them with knowledge of this issue, is a murderer.

Graphene Hydroxide is a new material and toxicologists aren’t aware of it yet. This is why people are dropping dead from these lethal shots, especially athletes, Dr. Noack explains. This is a “highly intelligent poison”.

What’s even more horrifying is that if you perform an autopsy you will not find anything. This stealth weapon is even untraceable after death. The Graphene Hydroxide nano-razerblades cause people to bleed to death internally.

“Even if people don’t drop dead immediately, it cuts up the blood vessels little by little… I can say as a chemist that we are absolutely certain that the Graphene Hydroxide is in there… as a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer.”

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/Ervbi96YgrzG/

Dr. Noack was killed just days after blowing the whistle and releasing this video.

His wife made an announcement that it was a brutal sneak attack.

She pleads with us to have the courage to BELIEVE and to ACT NOW to expose this! She said her husband is a kind soul and he did this for us, he died for all of us.

There are some rumors being spread to distract and confuse you regarding his suspected murder and the mainstream media is ever silent but here is some additional evidence that he was killed. Dr. Noack’s wife just released an update saying she believes he was attacked by a radiation beam.

Send out this video and my article to all doctors, experts and world leaders now.

Governments are already injecting 5-year-olds with Pharma’s kill shots containing Graphene Hydroxide razors. This technology will cut up their insides and delivery a gruesome, painful death to our kids!

Last year the Austrian police busted down Dr. Noack’s door and arrested him in an attempt to stop him from speaking out. The incident was recorded on camera. He was clearly a target.

Dr Pablo Campra was the first to deduce that the Pfizer serum contains Graphene Oxide flakes using Transmission Electron Microscopy in July, 2021. His techniques of detection also included infrared spectroscopy combined with optical microscopy.

Prior to Dr. Campra’s discovery, another Spanish research team named La Quinta Columna, released their discovery in June, that the COVID serums in all their variants, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc., contain a considerable dose of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles, reported by Global Research.

Dr. Ricardo Delgado a biostatistician and founder of La Quinta Columna, discovered that 99% of the Pfizer contents are Graphene Oxide. His team was smeared by fact checkers who provided no evidence of their libelous claims.

In my article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide,” I explain the chemical process involved in reducing Graphene Oxide to a clear liquid serum by reducing its oxygen content. By doing so, Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) is more lethal. So yes, it’s scientifically possible that COVID serums can be 99% Graphene Oxide.

Dr. Delgado’s team released a scientific report of their optical and electron microscopy analysis showing Graphene Oxide was found in four “Covid-19 Vaccines”. Orwell City broke the news in English. Then La Quinta Columna requested an Interim Report from the University of Almeria entitled, “DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION SAMPLE”.

La Quinta Columna’s report was originally published in Spanish on June 28, 2021.

The problem is that this is not a vaccine, this is a dose of graphene to a person.”– Dr. Ricardo Delgado

Whitney Webb attempted a smear piece on La Quinta Columna and the University of Almeria’s discovery, where she directly attacked Dr. Ricardo Delgado’s credibility without anything substantial. Investigative Journalist Ramola D. and myself debunked Whitney’s Webb of lies.

On August 19, another research team going by the name “The Scientist Club” found Graphene in 7 prominent Biotech serums using Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments to verify the serums morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.

For obvious reasons, The Scientist Club kept their identity secret. They analyzed Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen and AstraZeneca and found a Carbon-based substrate with nanoparticles embedded, Graphene sheets and Graphene Oxide.

Undeclared metal-containing components were found by scientists in Japan, which caused the Japanese Government to halt the use of Moderna’s serums. The Japanese Ministry reported that the particles found reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal contaminant. Graphene, Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RDO) all have paramagnetic properties.

A September, a German team revealed damning evidence of “vaccine” contaminants and autopsies linking “vaccines” to deaths.

Dr. T. made a call out to all medical professionals in this urgent announcement asking medical professionals to report magnetic phenomenon because she believes that Graphene Oxide flakes are responsible for the “vaccine”-induced magnetism that we have witnessed internationally. Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy (retired) of Imperial College London has explained the possible mechanism here.

Pfizer Whistleblower Karen Kingston revealed in August, how Graphene Oxide was hidden under a trade secret and that’s why it wasn’t listed in the patents. However Kingston explains, it is in fact the key ingredient in the Covid-19 serums.

Another Chief Scientist for Pfizer blew the whistle in November, leaking internal emails on Stew Peter’s Show from top Pfizer executives and scientists discussing how they were going to hide from the public that Graphene Oxide is in their serums.

In April 2021, Health Canada recalled a million and a half KN95 face masks containing Graphene. Children had been forced to wear these masks in Canadian schools. Health Canada compared wearing them to breathing in asbestos all day long. These poisonous masks came from China’s Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd.

Dr. Robert Young used Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy which revealed Graphene Oxide in four Covid-19 trade marked serums, September 11, 2021.

Dr. Franc Zalewski also found Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer serum.

Dr. Antonietta Gatti did a recent video interview on the toxicity of Graphene Oxide Nanometallic particulates to cells. She has found them in the “vaccines”, PCR kits and face masks.

In her groundbreaking 2017 report with Dr. Stefano Montanari, Dr. Antoinetta Gatti explains Nanoparticles inside cells destroy the innate defense mechanism of cells and cause blood clots, deadly inflammation, thrombi, and multi-organ failure posed by nanometallic particulates, which are non-biodegradable and indeed biopersistent. They can both enter cells, harm DNA, and be carried by the blood to bind with organic matter and coagulate in organs.

A Slovakian team analyzed PCR kit nasal swabs using SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in a hospital laboratory from Bratislava. The team found that when DARPA’s Graphene Oxide Hydrogels come in contact with organic fluid (e.g., saliva) within a few minutes they begin to form rectangular crystal structures. These gradually grow in a fractal manner. A German research team also filmed the crystalline growth of the GO Hydrogels.

Science Papers and Patents

Several scientific papers show that Graphene Oxide is being used in gene therapy as a scaffold or platform for the delivery of mRNA into cells by way of its high electrical conductivity and ability to permeate cell membranes. The crystalline networks form in bodily fluid and replicate after injection and in the serum itself, as shown in this video of the Pfizer serum. It sure does look like nano high frequency antennas.

Scientists have developed a novel way of making carbon nanotubes at the NanoScience Center of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland, and at Harvard University, in the US.

Graphene was part of the first human genome project initiated in 2001. mRNA gene therapy Nanotech using Graphene Oxide as a vector, runs on CRISPR technology and it was developed by Pfizer,Moderna, and BioNTech, as a treatment for sick cancer patients. Due to its cytotoxicity (cell death) in healthy cells and the fact that all the animals died in the animal trials, Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology was never approved for use on Humans! Why is this technology now being used on healthy people and on children, who are at no risk of COVID?

It should be quite clear to everyone by now that the pharmaceutical cartel is using this technology worldwide, in illegal Human trials and trying to mandate their poisonous “vaccines” on everyone, with impunity.

Nanografi is manufacturing Graphene Oxide Nanotubes and intranasal vaccines for Covid-19 drug delivery.

Scientists have already studied the Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation by intra-nasal spray, using thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. Make no mistake about it, nasal spray “vaccines” contain Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles.

If you’re still not convinced, here’s a main stream media article trying to pitch Graphene Oxide “flu vaccine” nasal spray as some kind of protective intervention.

Dr. Chunhong Dong is lead author of a study from the Institute for Biomedical Sciences in China where he boasts,

“This study gives new insights into developing high performance intranasal vaccine systems with two-dimensional sheet-like nanoparticles.”

Graphene Oxide has been carefully engineered as a “vaccine adjuvant for immunotherapy” and Polyethylene glycol (PEG), another highly toxic poison, is used as coating polymers. PEGs are widely used as additives in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food. But PEGs come with potential life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis.

This is not a big name brand but they do mention “Carbon graphene loaded nano particles and micro-particles” in their Sars-Cov2 patent invention.

Here’s a list of peer reviewed medical studies on Graphene Oxide Toxicity and how it coagulates the blood. How much more evidence do you need to BELIEVE?

Dr. Armin Koroknay, Research director of Private Consultants and Research Institute of Zürich, analyzed the effects of COVID “Vaccination” on Blood.

Click here to watch the video.

Dr. Bärbel Ghitalla and her team put different brands under a microscope and found things they could not explain, but are explained in the “Covid-19 vaccine” patents.

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/Kw91vO6ryHp8/

Are you a believer now?

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

All images in this article are from Ariyana LoveThe original source of this article is Ariyana LoveCopyright © Dr. Ariyana LoveAriyana Love, 2021


Pfizer Report: Yes it’s a killer vaccine

https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-pfizers-secret-report-on-the-covid-vaccine-beyond-manslaughter-the-evidence-is-overwhelming-the-vaccine-should-be-immediately-withdrawn-worldwide/5780561

There is a worldwide upward trend of vaccine deaths and injuries. The latest official figures (April 3, 2022) point to approximately: 

69,053 Covid-19 injection related deaths and 10,997,085 injuries  for the EU, US and UK Combined for a population of 830 million people

Based on reported cases. Only a small fraction of the victims or families of the deceased will go through the tedious process of reporting vaccine related deaths and adverse events to the national health authorities. Based on historical data (Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS, p. 6)

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. … less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. (emphasis added)

This Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure provides data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).


Bombshell Document Dump on Pfizer Vaccine Data

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 29, 2022 


The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was launched in the US on the 14th of December after the granting of Emergency Use Authorization on December 11, 2020. 

In a twisted irony, the data revealed in this “insider report” refutes the official vaccine narrative peddled by the governments and the WHO. It also confirms the analysis of numerous medical doctors and scientists who have revealed the devastating consequences of the mRNA “vaccine”. 

What is contained in  Pfizer’s “confidential” report is detailed evidence on the impacts of the “vaccine” on mortality and morbidity. This data which emanates from the “Horse’s Mouth” can now be used to confront as well formulate legal procedures against Big Pharma, the governments, the WHO and the media.

In a Court of Law, the evidence contained in this Big Pharma confidential report (coupled with the data on deaths and adverse events compiled by the national authorities in the EU, UK and USis irrefutable: because it is their data and their estimates and not ours. 

Bear in mind: it’s data which is based on reported and recorded cases, which constitute a small percentage of the actual number of vaccine related deaths and adverse events. 

This is a de facto Mea Culpa on the part of Pfizer. #Yes it is a Killer Vaccine

Pfizer was fully aware that the mRNA vaccine which it is marketing Worldwide would result in a wave of mortality and morbidity. This is tantamount to a crime against humanity on the part of Big Pharma.

Pfizer knew from the outset that it was a killer vaccine. 

It is also a  Mea Culpa and Treason on the part of corrupt national governments Worldwide which are being threatened and bribed by Big Pharma.

No attempt has been made by the governments to call for the withdrawal of the killer vaccine.

People are told  that the vaccine is intended to save lives.

Click here to read the Pfizer report.  

Also see details in the Appendices.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

The original source of this article is Lux Media and Global Research

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Lux Media and Global Research, 2022


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Related Articles from our Archives

Bombshell Document Dump on Pfizer Vaccine Data29 April 2022

Newly Released Pfizer Documents Reveal COVID Jab Dangers23 March 2022

FDA Dumps More Pfizer Documents: Why Were So Many Adverse Events Reported as ‘Unrelated’ to Vaccine?19 May 2022

Pentagon Drops Truth Bombs to Stave Off War with Russia

by Joe Lauria

Global Research, March 25, 2022

Consortiumnews 23 March 2022

Two leaked stories from the Pentagon have exposed the lies of mainstream media about how Russia is conducting the Ukraine war in a bid to counter propaganda intended to get NATO into the conflict, writes Joe Lauria.

The Pentagon is engaged in a consequential battle with the U.S. State Department and the Congress to prevent a direct military confrontation with Russia, which could unleash the most unimaginable horror of war.

President Joe Biden is caught in the middle of the fray. So far he is siding with the Defense Department, saying there cannot be a NATO no-fly zone over Ukraine fighting Russian aircraft because “that’s called World War III, okay? Let’s get it straight here, guys. We will not fight the third world war in Ukraine.”

“President Biden’s been clear that U.S. troops won’t fight Russia in Ukraine, and if you establish a no-fly zone, certainly in order to enforce that no-fly zone, you’ll have to engage Russian aircraft. And again, that would put us at war with Russia,” said U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin earlier this month. (The administration plan is to bring down the Russian government through a ground insurgency and economic war, not a direct military one.)

But pressure on the White House from some members of Congress and especially the press corps is unrelenting to recklessly bring NATO directly into the war. (Secretary of State Antony Blinken who initially backed a plan to send NATO planes from Poland to Ukraine has backed down and now opposes the no-fly zone.) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, hailed as a virtual superhero in Western media, has vacillated between openness to negotiating a peace settlement with Russia and calling for NATO to “close the skies” above Ukraine. To save his country he appears willing to risk endangering the entire world.

(The Pentagon’s mettle will be tested if there is a chemical weapons attack in Ukraine. Biden has said Russia would be a “severe price” but who the perpetrator would be might be murky.)

Meanwhile, Western corporate media, depending almost exclusively on Ukrainian sources, report that Russia is losing the war, with its military offensive “stalled,” and in frustration has deliberately targeted civilians and flattened cities.

Biden has bought into this part of the story, calling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “war criminal.” He has also said that Russia is planning a “false flag” chemical attack to pin on Ukraine.

But on Tuesday, the Pentagon took the bold step of leaking two stories to reporters that contradict those tales. “Russia’s conduct in the brutal war tells a different story than the widely accepted view that Vladimir Putin is intent on demolishing Ukraine and inflicting maximum civilian damage—and it reveals the Russian leader’s strategic balancing act,” reported Newsweek in an article entitled, “Putin’s Bombers Could Devastate Ukraine But He’s Holding Back. Here’s Why.”

The piece quotes an unnamed analyst at the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) saying,

“The heart of Kyiv has barely been touched. And almost all of the long-range strikes have been aimed at military targets.”

A retired U.S. Air Force officer now working as an analyst for a Pentagon contractor, added:

“We need to understand Russia’s actual conduct. If we merely convince ourselves that Russia is bombing indiscriminately, or [that] it is failing to inflict more harm because its personnel are not up to the task or because it is technically inept, then we are not seeing the real conflict.”

The article says:

“As of the past weekend, in 24 days of conflict, Russia has flown some 1,400 strike sorties and delivered almost 1,000 missiles (by contrast, the United States flew more sorties and delivered more weapons in the first day of the 2003 Iraq war). …

A proportion of those strikes have damaged and destroyed civilian structures and killed and injured innocent civilians, but the level of death and destruction is low compared to Russia’s capacity.

‘I know it’s hard … to swallow that the carnage and destruction could be much worse than it is,’ says the DIA analyst. ‘But that’s what the facts show. This suggests to me, at least, that Putin is not intentionally attacking civilians, that perhaps he is mindful that he needs to limit damage in order to leave an out for negotiations.’”

A second retired U.S. Air Force officer says:

“I’m frustrated by the current narrative—that Russia is intentionally targeting civilians, that it is demolishing cities, and that Putin doesn’t care. Such a distorted view stands in the way of finding an end before true disaster hits or the war spreads to the rest of Europe. I know that the news keeps repeating that Putin is targeting civilians, but there is no evidence that Russia is intentionally doing so. In fact, I’d say that Russia could be killing thousands more civilians if it wanted to.”

These Pentagon sources confirm what Putin and the Russian Ministry of Defense have been saying all along: that instead of being “stalled,” Russia is executing a methodical war plan to encircle cities, opening humanitarian corridors for civilians, leaving civilian infrastructure like water, electricity, telephony and internet intact, and trying to avoid as many civilian casualties as possible.

Until these Pentagon leaks it was difficult to confirm that Russia was entirely telling the truth and that corporate media were publishing fables cooked up by Ukraine’s publicity machine.

No Evidence of Chemicals

The second article directly undermines Biden’s dramatic warning about a false flag chemical attack. Reuters reported:

“The United States has not yet seen any concrete indications of an imminent Russian chemical or biological weapons attack in Ukraine but is closely monitoring streams of intelligence for them, a senior U.S. defense official said.”

It quoted the Pentagon official as saying,

“There’s no indication that there’s something imminent in that regard right now.” Neither The New York Times nor The Washington Post published the Reuters article, which appeared in the more obscure U.S. News and World Report. 

Never let the facts get in the way of a good story — even if it could lead to the most devastating consequences in history.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @globalresearch_crg and Twitter at @crglobalization. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.  

Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief of Consortium News and a former U.N. correspondent for The Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, and numerous other newspapers, including The Montreal Gazette and The Star of Johannesburg. He was an investigative reporter for the Sunday Times of London, a financial reporter for Bloomberg News and began his professional work as a 19-year old stringer for The New York Times.  He can be reached at joelauria@consortiumnews.com and followed on Twitter @unjoe  

https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-drops-truth-bombs-stave-off-war-russia/5775427

European Union proposes international pandemic treaty

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/coronavirus/pandemic-treaty/

Latest news

https://newsroom.consilium.europa.eu/embed/230660 When a pandemic strikes, everyone is vulnerable.

Council gives green light to start negotiations on international pandemic treaty

On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

The intergovernmental negotiating body, tasked with drafting and negotiating this international instrument, will hold its next meeting by 1 August 2022, to discuss progress on a working draft. It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.

……A convention, agreement or other international instrument is legally binding under international law. An agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response adopted under the World Health Organization (WHO) would enable countries around the globe to strengthen national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics.

Stop this outrage before it gathers speed.

2 Covid Stories–about death, recovery, and “the Protocol”

My adult son and I tested positive for Covid-19 at the same time. For about a week we felt relatively fine, but suddenly absolute exhaustion set in. His oxygen levels were quite low, so he decided to go to the hospital. I stayed home to recover under the care of my daughter. A few days after he had arrived at the hospital, he requested to be treated with the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) Math+ Hospital Treatment Protocol

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/FLCCC-Alliance-MATHplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf.

The doctors refused. His sister wrote a letter also requesting Math+, along with all of the literature. She offered to sign a liability waver. They again refused.

For the first few days my son was alert and talking. They did not allow my daughter into the room to speak with him; short cell-phone contact only. This made it impossible to discuss what the doctors were planning. Later, when he was in a coma and on the ventilator, we were allowed into his room every day.

Without informed consent, they immediately placed my son on “the usual hospital COVID protocol”, as directed by Dr. Bonnie Henry. Right away the doctors put him on nineteen medications (19), many of which have side effects of trouble breathing, anxiety, confusion, mental depression, etc. In this “cocktail” they included Dexamethasone and Baricitinib. (The FDA has not approved Baricitinib for Covid; it is designated “for emergency use only”.) In addition, some of the drugs they gave him were opioids—but they also gave him drugs for which opioids are contraindicated. (Note: There is no valid study about this combination of drugs. No one can say what such a combination of 19 drugs does to a body.)

Dr. Bonnie Henry’s standard hospital protocol, the Status of Recommendations, is based on BC’s Centre for Disease Control (CDC) treatment recommendations http://www.bccdc.ca/health-professionals/clinicalresources/covid-19-care/treatments.

It includes Remdesivir (a drug proven to cause kidney failure), but prohibits Ivermectin, one of the safest drugs known, and warns against “unproven or ineffective therapies” such as Dexamethasone as well as vitamins D, C, and Aspirin. It does not warn against an unproven combination of drugs such as the nineteen medications given my son immediately upon arrival at the hospital. The Status states that doctors must abide by the “public health system”, and includes the following: “The Ivermectin/Math+ Protocol has been developed by experienced physicians treating hospitalized Covid-19 patients; at this time, it has not been adopted as a medical consensus.”

I phoned a doctor who had previously prescribed Ivermectin. She said she would get her hands chopped off if she did that now. The BC College of Physicians and Surgeons had instructed pharmacies that they are no longer allowed to fill prescriptions of Ivermectin. The doctors transferred my son to the ICU. Six days after arrival at the hospital, after they had administered “the cocktail”, which included Dexamethasone and Baricinitib, they intubated him (a mechanical ventilator down his throat). Their own report states that he was still requesting Math+, but again the doctors proceeded with Dr. Bonnie Henry’s approved hospital protocol—again without his informed consent. Midazolam was later added, a commonly used drug in palliative care.

They put him into a medically-induced coma with three heavy IV (intravenous) drugs: Fentanyl, Ketamine, Rocuronium. The doctors continued with the unproved “cocktail”, as well as many other drugs; they included minimal doses of a few vitamins.

I wrote a letter to a director of the hospital and to all six of the rotating treating doctors. In my letter I begged them: 2 “To you, who is familiar with the face of death in hospitals, my son’s death would be just another COVID-19 statistic. To me, the mother, it will be the death of my only son…I request that you IMMEDIATELY implement the Math+ Protocol to aid in his recovery…I ask you, if your son’s or daughter’s condition was deteriorating after 12 days of your “approved hospital protocol treatment for Covid-19”, would you not at least TRY the harmless and evidence-based Math+ Protocol?” I pleaded with them to not let my son die. I enclosed a liability waiver—all to no avail.

In response to my letter, the Director of Clinical Operations phoned and once again quoted Dr. Bonnie Henry’s iron-clad hospital protocol. We wrote to the doctors a total of six times. I reminded them of their Hippocratic Oath, “First do no harm”—that by refusing to use evidence-based, life-saving treatments they are doing harm. Our pleas fell on deaf ears. In a last-ditch effort we requested my son be treated with high dose vitamin C, as recommended by the Math+ protocol: “If in ICU and not improving: Consider Mega-Doses [of vitamin C]: 25 grams [25,000 milligrams] IV twice daily for 3 days”.

The doctors even refused to try the safe, effective, and harmless vitamin C. The six rotating doctors kept us in the dark; they refused to speak to us. In fact, they avoided us. The nurses gave us bits of incidental information to keep us placated. On the last day, a doctor admitted that he was “kind of a soldier on the ground…I have absolutely no power…”. When they told his sister that her brother would likely have to go on a ventilator, she again wrote a letter requesting the Math+ hospital treatment protocol, together with the relevant literature; the doctor crossed his arms and refused to take the letter. She then handed it to the nurse and asked it be put into the file.

My son was kept on a mechanical ventilator and in a medically induced coma for 21 days. The doctors had also been giving him blood pressure medication that apparently had kept his heart beating. We were asked to agree to stop this heart medication so that he could finally die. The hospital report states that my son had no comorbid conditions. His family doctor once remarked that he had above normal health.

The doctor’s report states that he died of Covid-19 pneumonia and complications of multiple organ failure. His entire body was swollen. A nurse commented, “Everyone in here gets puffy”. I held my son’s hand as he lay dying—a bloated piece of yellow rubber. My daughter and I had visited a seemingly dead body on a daily basis. It was heartbreaking.

#2. As for myself, after testing positive, I felt fine for about a week, then suddenly became so exhausted that I could not even lift my arm. My daughter drove up from out of town. She immediately phoned the Canadian Covid Care Alliance https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/treatment-protocols/who also uses Math+.

My daughter phoned Canadian Covid TeleHealth; they provide medical advice across Canada http://www.covidtelehealth.ca. They referred me to Dr. Ira Bernstein. He consulted with me by phone, then faxed a prescription to a local pharmacy: Nitazoxanide, Prednisone, and Azithromycin. After two weeks, with use of these medications, a few days of minimal supplemental oxygen, and liberal use of vitamin C—and under my daughter’s care—I was fully recovered. I am 80 years old and pre-diabetic. The doctor who saved my life is now in danger of losing his license. He is therefore no longer treating patients suffering from Covid-19. What a loss.

My son was a photojournalist; children and animals loved him. For my daughter and I there will be no more birthdays and Christmases. Without my son, my golden years are golden no more.

3. I have written this story in the hope that the information presented will save lives. (Names withheld.)

***** One must ask: Why are our governments and health authorities not providing its citizens with information regarding prevention and effective early treatment?

Why are the FLCCC’s safe, treatments forbidden? Why are Baricinitib and Remdesivir still being used? American Front Line Nurses are vehemently against these. Early treatment would save lives. It would also prevent the strain on hospitals, doctors, and nurses; it would stop ruining our economy, businesses, and families. If we were all provided with information about prevention and care before Covid gets out of hand (turning blue and shortness of breath), we could live with this virus like we live with the flu.

Early treatment is—and has always been—the solution. In some countries the government distributes home care kits to its citizens. My son’s story is the story of thousands of people across the country. It is not an isolated incident. To date (February 27, 2022) there have been 2,851 Covid deaths in BC. Our governments are suppressing life-saving treatments. Hospital directors, doctors, and nurses are “just following orders”: Dr. Bonnie Henry’s protocol, as dictated by the BC CDC.

At a U.S. senate hearing (January 24, 2022), top level doctors and medical experts agreed: Hospitals are no longer safe https://rumble.com/vta828-highlight-reel-sen.-ron-johnsons-covid19-a-second-opinion.html.

Justin Trudeau’s Swastikas. “Democracy with Neo-Nazi Characteristics”. The Emergencies Act is Revoked

At Home and Abroad. “Fans the Flames of An Unjustified National Emergency”

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, February 24, 2022

Region: Canada

Theme: Media DisinformationPolice State & Civil Rights

In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT

UPDATE

Justin Trudeau has carried out an illegal and criminal police operation headed by an unapproved interim police chief against the Freedom Convoy. It started last Thursday, February 17th. 

The measures taken included police violence, mass arrests, illegal freezing of bank accounts and the confiscation of truckers’ vehicles. 

Trudeau had invoked the application of the 1988 Emergencies Act four days prior to the Vote in the House of Commons on Monday Evening. 

On Tuesday, the Senate met and was requested by the government’s representative to make a decision without having access to so-called ‘secret information’, a report which allegedly confirmed that the application of the Emergencies Act was required and justified. 

Visibly there was absolutely no evidence to support a major police operation against the Freedom Convoy.

Trudeau is a Liar. He was was informed on Tuesday that the Senate might refuse to rubber stamp the extension of the Emergencies Act.

Also on Tuesday the Premier of Alberta launched a lawsuit directed against Trudeau:

Kenney called the move – which Trudeau has argued is necessary to deal with a state of emergency caused by convoy protests and blockades – “one of the biggest mistakes of any modern Canadian government.”

Mistaken is a polite understatement.

And on Wednesday February 23 Trudeau backtracked. He confirmed that the Application of the Emergencies Act was no longer necessary and that it would be revoked within ten days. 

The article below pertains to Trudeau’s accusations (without a shred of evidence) that the Freedom Convoy is Anti-semitic, when the evidence amply suggests that Trudeau himself is Anti-semitic.

A group of 23 prominent Israeli doctors and scientists wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau “chastising him for equating demonstrators participating in the Freedom Convoy to Nazis”.

The important fight against antisemitism should not be weaponized and directed at a legitimate civil protest which aims at restoring fundamental freedoms, to what used to be, not long ago, one of the freest countries in the world,” said the group in a letter on Friday”.

But there is something else which the media has failed to acknowledge. The forbidden truth is that Trudeau is known to have supported the Neo-Nazi Svoboda Party in Ukraine which has committed countless atrocities directed against Kiev’s Jewish Community.

“Equating demonstrators to Nazis” when our Prime-Minster Justin Trudeau in 2016 welcomed Andriy Parubiy (left of Trudeau),  leader of the Svoboda party to the House of Commons. (details in the article below).

All of this is on record. This is no joking matter.

I call upon Canada’s Jewish Community to take a firm stance on the matter.

Michel Chossudovsky,

Global Research, February 23, 2022

***

Justin Trudeau is unceasingly referring to swastikas intimating that the Freedom Convoy organizers are not only supportive of  Nazi symbols but are anti-Semitic. 

And on February 16,  he directed these wild accusations against the Conservative Party of Canada:

“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was cautioned against using “inflammatory” language by the Speaker of the House of Commons on Wednesday after he told Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman, who is Jewish, that her party stands with “people who wave swastikas.”

Ms. Lantsman, the MP for Thornhill, north of Toronto, told the House that Mr. Trudeau “fans the flames of an unjustified national emergency” and asked, “When did the Prime Minister lose his way?”

He responded by saying, “Conservative Party members can stand with people who wave swastikas. They can stand with people who wave the Confederate flag”. ( Globe and Mail)

In substance, Trudeau is accusing Conservative Party members of being Neo-Nazis.

Video: Is Justin Trudeau anti-semitic?? 

Video: Trudeau has lost control of the situation 

.

On February 2  ” Prime Minister Justin in a rather unusual and RIDICULOUS “twit” made the following declaration (allegedly adopted by a unanimous vote of the House of Commons). REALLY?

The following video refutes Trudeau’s accusations 

.

“Democracy with Neo-Nazi Characteristics”?

At the time of writing, the application of a National Emergency directed against The Freedom Convoy 2022 is being debated in the House of Commons. According to Trudeau, the scope of the Emergency is “reasonable”, the measures do not encroach upon Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, says Trudeau.

The House of Commons is divided. The NDP has signified that it will be siding with the Liberal minority government.

Meanwhile, a major police initiative against the Freedom Convoy involving a high tech “Nazi style” special forces operation is contemplated by the Prime Minister Trudeau.

This decision should come as no surprise. Both Prime Minister Trudeau together with Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland (as part of Canada’s foreign policy) have “unofficially” supported Neo-Nazi politics in Ukraine.

Is the Trudeau Government supplying weapons and training to the Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion?

Neo-Nazi politics in Ukraine is not a “Fringe Movement”, it is embedded in the military and national security apparatus, supported by the US and Canada.

According to the Ottawa Citizen (November 9, 2021)

“Canadian officials who met with members of a Ukrainian battalion linked to neo-Nazis didn’t denounce the unit, but were instead concerned the media would expose details of the get-together, according to newly released documents.

The Canadians met with and were briefed by leaders from the Azov Battalion in June 2018. The officers and diplomats did not object to the meeting and instead allowed themselves to be photographed with battalion officials despite previous warnings that the unit saw itself as pro-Nazi. The Azov Battalion then used those photos for its online propaganda, pointing out the Canadian delegation expressed “hopes for further fruitful co-operation.”

The Azov battalion which is part of Ukraine’s National Guard under the helm of the Ministry of the Interior is supported by Canadian tax payers.

Canada’s military training cooperation agreement with Ukraine has raised the concern of the Jewish Community. The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center (FSWC)  “has called for an investigation by Canada’s Department of National Defence:

“We urge the Department of National Defence to immediately launch an investigation into the evidence that has been revealed by the George Washington University study and to develop new policies and procedures to ensure that all foreign trainees receive some type of background check to eliminate the possibility of neo-Nazi or other extremist affiliation before receiving training from Canadian forces.” (quoted in the Jerusalem Post, emphasis added)

See the NATO Flag (left), The Azov Battalion Nazi Insigna and the Swastika

Ukraine-Neo-Natzi-Militia

Ukraine Neo-Nazi Militia

Who is Waving Swastikas?

Trudeau Accuses the Conservative Party of  Supporting “People who Wave Swastikas.” 

Does that not Describe Trudeau’s Relationship with Svoboda Neo-Nazi Party Leader Andrey Korubiy?

The leader of the Neo-Nazi party Svoboda Andrey Korubiy is a “political buddy” of our prime minister.

Andriy Parubiy co-founder of the Neo-Nazi  Social-National Party of Ukraine (subsequently renamed Svoboda) was invited by Trudeau to Ottawa in 2016.

Andriy Parubiy believes that it was necessary “to introduce direct democracy to Ukraine, with Hitler as its torchbearer.”

Justin Trudeau invites Andriy Parubiy to Ottawa

Deputy Chairman of Ukraine’s Parliament, Andriy Parubiy, visited Ottawa in February 2016, meeting with the prime minister. At that meeting (from left) are Ukraine’s Ambassador to Canada Andriy Shevchenko, Verkhovna Rada Deputy Chairman Andriy Parubiy, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Member of Parliament Borys Wrzesnewskyj.

Andriy Parubiy  is a supporter of World War II Nazi leader Stepan Bandera.

Reuters / Gleb Garanich

Anti-Semitism

While Trudeau accuses the Freedom Convoy of  anti-semitism (without a shred of evidence), he is supportive of the Ukraine’s National Guard which is integrated by Neo-Nazi elements.

Meanwhile (February 13),  Trudeau confirmed that Canada will be “sending $7.8 million worth of lethal equipment and ammunition to Ukraine”.

Andrey Parubiy’s Neo-Nazi party Svoboda is leading the campaign against Kiev’s Jewish community. Juden Raus!  (Jews Out!) is their motto.

The Jewish Community in Ukraine

Oleksandr Feldman president of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, accused   the Svoboda party in “engaging in anti-Semitic hate speech”.  According to the Times of Israel: (January 2017 report)

Ukrainian nationalists [Parubiy’s followers] in Kiev chanted “Jews out” in German at a New Year’s Day march celebrating the birthday of a Nazi collaborator whose troops killed thousands of Jews.

Thousands attended the event in the center of the Ukrainian capital celebrating Stepan Bandera, a leader of Ukraine’s nationalist movement in the 1930s and ’40s. They held up his portrait while an unidentified person shouted the anti-Semitic slogan on a loudspeaker, prompting many participants to repeat it, a video published by the Federal News Agency showed.

Bandera’s movement included an insurgent army which fought alongside Nazi soldiers during part of World War II. Supporters of Bandera claim they sided with the Nazis against the Soviet army, believing that Adolf Hitler would grant Ukraine independence.

In 2018, Parubiy was accused by the British media for praising Adolph Hitler

Andrey Parubiy was also received by the US Congress

Is it a matter of concern that Canadian forces dispatched by our government are training Nazi paramilitary forces in Ukraine?

There is ample evidence of Canadian and US support to Neo-Nazis in Ukraine going back to the 2014 Euromaidan,
https://www.youtube.com/embed/mlh6gJmmlN8

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2022


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Related Articles

Who Are the True Insurrectionists That Illegally Took Over Ottawa?

Feb 23, 2022

The Right to Protest in the Stolen Indigenous Territory Called Canada

Feb 20, 2022

Is Justin Trudeau Waging a War on the National Security of Canada and Canadians?

Feb 19, 2022

Selected Articles: Justin Trudeau Accuses Jewish Member of Parliament for Supporting Nazis

Feb 17, 2022

Trudeau’s Emergency Bid to Wage a War on His Political Opponents Is Based on Fraud and Wholesale Violations of Canada’s Constitution

Feb 16, 2022

Canada’s Freedom Convoy: Unmasking the Divisiveness of Justin Trudeau

Feb 12, 2022

Divisions and Chaos Within the Ottawa Police. Violence and Brute Force Ordered by Trudeau Government20 February 2022

Repressing the Freedom Convoy: Will Trudeau’s Act of Desperation Succeed?19 February 2022

Trudeau Orders Major Police Operation against the Liberty Convoy18 February 2022


Articles by:Prof Michel Chossudovsky

About the author:

Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research.  He has taught as visiting professor in Western Europe, Southeast Asia, the Pacific and Latin America. He has served as economic adviser to governments of developing countries and has acted as a consultant for several international organizations. He is the author of eleven books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Global Economic Crisis, The Great Depression of the Twenty-first Century (2009) (Editor), Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War (2011), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015). He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica.  His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com