Focused on BC’s wildfire weather war crisis, I was drawn into the CO2 debate when I learned that the UN IPCC leaves military missions out of their Reports–and has done for 22 years. Even assuming the UN dictate that civilian emissions are the single cause of global warming, distracting us from escalating militarism and wars, with the global consequences of misunderstanding, conflict and chaos, is criminal.
This blatant but camouflaged political agenda moved me to finally take time out to read the UN IPCC scientists who quit. They point out that the UN IPCC falsely claims scientific consensus for political reasons.
This is detailed in the brilliant video interview with Nils-Axel Moerner, retired head of paleogeophysics and geodynamics at Stockholm University, IPCC reviewer on sea levels in 2000. He quit after the IPCC repeatedly refused to discuss his data. He gives a comprehensive picture of scientific data on sea levels, and several political agendas.
https://redpilluniversity.org/2019/02/12/un-ipcc-scientist-debunks-un-climate-lies/
You can see here: a list of many other dissident UN IPCC scientists at: https://granitegrok.com/blog/2017/02/un-scientists-turned-ipcc.
Russian scientist Andrei Kapitsa and others: https://gyancorner.blogspot.com/2008/07/challenging-basis-of-kyoto-protocol.html.
Freeman Dyson: independent emeritus scientist (at age 91): https://www.52-insights.com/freeman-dyson-i-kept-quiet-for-30-years-so-maybe-its-time-to-speak-interview-science/
“To me, the really urgent risks are still war and peace and that’s far more serious to me than anything that can happen as a result of climate change.”
Stop-weather-war 