The Federation of American Scientists confirms in January the news given by Grandangolo in December 2022 based on a U.S. Air Force document: the C-17A Globemaster aircraft has been authorized to carry the U.S. B61-12 nuclear bomb to Italy and other European countries. Since Biden Administration officials had announced that the B61-12 shipment would be brought forward to December, we believe that the new US nuclear bombs are already arriving in Europe to be deployed against Russia.
The U.S. and NATO are pouring into Ukraine huge amounts of heavy artillery munitions supplied to the Kiev armed forces. The U.S.-according to official figures-has so far sent more than one million rounds of ammunition for 155 mm howitzers to Ukraine, plus tens of thousands of missiles. About 300,000 rounds of ammunition come from U.S. military depots in Israel. The arms shipment is managed by an international network, in which Camp Darby- the largest U.S. arsenal outside the motherland, connected to the port of Livorno and Pisa military airport – plays a central role. Britain, France, Poland and Finland are supplying Kiev with tanks, and Poland is purchasing Abrams tanks from the U.S. Some of which may be destined for Ukraine.
At the same time, the U.S. and NATO are enhancing the deployment of their forces in Europe, increasingly close to Russia. In Romania, NATO deployed AWACS aircraft, equipped with the most sophisticated electronic equipment, kept constantly in flight near Russian airspace. Also in Romania, the Pentagon deployed the 101st Airborne Division, which is being deployed to Europe for the first time since World War II.
NATO and the EU establish “a task force on resilience and critical infrastructure.” “NATO,” declares the Council of the European Union, “remains the foundation of our collective defense. We recognize the value of a stronger European Defense that contributes to transatlantic security and is complementary and interoperable with NATO.”
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
This article was originally published on byoblu.
Manlio Dinucci, award winning author, geopolitical analyst and geographer, Pisa, Italy. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
The original source of this article is Global Research
I compiled all the evidence we have into this article that prove Graphene Oxide, Graphene Hydroxide and other Graphene variants are in fact being injected into people by governments and Big Pharma.
This evidence was discovered and proven numerous times already by independent research teams, scientists, Biotech whistleblowers and the few ethical Journalists remaining.
There’s a concerted effort by the pharmaceutical cartel funded “fact checkers,” Big Tech platforms and mainstream media, to hide the evidence and slander the people bringing this to light.
Once you go over the evidence provided here, you must take action for the safety of you and your families.
Serve all war criminals participating in this COVID death jab program with a Notice of Liability for the murders they are committing.
This is definitive action that any person can take, worldwide.
The notices are already drafted by legal teams so why not use them and let our enemies be on the defensive. The criminals will be reminded of the Nuremberg trials, and informed that they will be brought to justice. They need to cease and desist from acting knowingly and willfully in mandating “vaccine” death jabs and enforcing them. The evidence to the danger is clear and deaths have been proven. Anyone administering or mandating these “vaccine” kill shots are doing so without Informed Consent.
Compilation of Evidence
On November 2nd, a prominent Professor at the University of Almeria, Dr. Pablo Campra, revealed his detection of Graphene in multiple Covid-19 “vaccine” vials, using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. The Dr. Campra’s University of Almeria report demonstrated the detection of Graphene and Graphene Oxide in 8 samples from various “vaccine” manufacturers.
In response, Dr. Andreas Noack released a scathing video commenting on Dr. Campra’s report. Dr. Noack is a chemist and the world’s leading expert in activated carbon engineering and GRAPHENE. Dr. Noack did his PhD doctoral thesis on how to turn Graphene Oxide into Graphene Hydroxide.
The video is of crucial importance. Dr. Noack said that two of the frequency bands that Dr. Campra detected were of Graphene Hydroxide. Graphene Hydroxide (GHO) is a mono-layer activated carbon, 50nm long and 0.1nm thick (an atom layer thick). Thus, the injections contain nano-razorblades of exceptional stability, which are non-biodegrable (a fact that every chemist knows).
In effect, these nano-razorblades cut up and destroy the heart, brain and cardiovascular system. The epithelial cells become rough so things stick to them. He says that toxicologists cannot find them in a petri dish by normal methods as they do not move and they don’t expect to discover nano-sized razor blades. Moreover, any doctor who injects them with knowledge of this issue, is a murderer.
Graphene Hydroxide is a new material and toxicologists aren’t aware of it yet. This is why people are dropping dead from these lethal shots, especially athletes, Dr. Noack explains. This is a “highly intelligent poison”.
What’s even more horrifying is that if you perform an autopsy you will not find anything. This stealth weapon is even untraceable after death. The Graphene Hydroxide nano-razerblades cause people to bleed to death internally.
“Even if people don’t drop dead immediately, it cuts up the blood vessels little by little… I can say as a chemist that we are absolutely certain that the Graphene Hydroxide is in there… as a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer.”
Dr. Noack was killed just days after blowing the whistle and releasing this video.
His wife made an announcement that it was a brutal sneak attack.
She pleads with us to have the courage to BELIEVE and to ACT NOW to expose this! She said her husband is a kind soul and he did this for us, he died for all of us.
There are some rumors being spread to distract and confuse you regarding his suspected murder and the mainstream media is ever silent but here is some additional evidence that he was killed. Dr. Noack’s wife just released an update saying she believes he was attacked by a radiation beam.
Send out this video and my article to all doctors, experts and world leaders now.
Governments are already injecting 5-year-olds with Pharma’s kill shots containing Graphene Hydroxide razors. This technology will cut up their insides and delivery a gruesome, painful death to our kids!
Last year the Austrian police busted down Dr. Noack’s door and arrested him in an attempt to stop him from speaking out. The incident was recorded on camera. He was clearly a target.
Dr Pablo Campra was the first to deduce that the Pfizer serum contains Graphene Oxide flakes using Transmission Electron Microscopy in July, 2021. His techniques of detection also included infrared spectroscopy combined with optical microscopy.
Prior to Dr. Campra’s discovery, another Spanish research team named La Quinta Columna, released their discovery in June, that the COVID serums in all their variants, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc., contain a considerable dose of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles, reported by Global Research.
Dr. Ricardo Delgado a biostatistician and founder of La Quinta Columna, discovered that 99% of the Pfizer contents are Graphene Oxide. His team was smeared by fact checkers who provided no evidence of their libelous claims.
In my article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide,” I explain the chemical process involved in reducing Graphene Oxide to a clear liquid serum by reducing its oxygen content. By doing so, Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) is more lethal. So yes, it’s scientifically possible that COVID serums can be 99% Graphene Oxide.
“The problem is that this is not a vaccine, this is a dose of graphene to a person.”– Dr. Ricardo Delgado
Whitney Webb attempted a smear piece on La Quinta Columna and the University of Almeria’s discovery, where she directly attacked Dr. Ricardo Delgado’s credibility without anything substantial. Investigative Journalist Ramola D. and myself debunked Whitney’s Webb of lies.
On August 19, another research team going by the name “The Scientist Club” found Graphene in 7 prominent Biotech serums using Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments to verify the serums morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.
For obvious reasons, The Scientist Club kept their identity secret. They analyzed Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen and AstraZeneca and found a Carbon-based substrate with nanoparticles embedded, Graphene sheets and Graphene Oxide.
Undeclared metal-containing components were found by scientists in Japan, which caused the Japanese Government to halt the use of Moderna’s serums. The Japanese Ministry reported that the particles found reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal contaminant. Graphene, Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RDO) all have paramagnetic properties.
Dr. T. made a call out to all medical professionals in this urgent announcement asking medical professionals to report magnetic phenomenon because she believes that Graphene Oxide flakes are responsible for the “vaccine”-induced magnetism that we have witnessed internationally. Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy (retired) of Imperial College London has explained the possible mechanism here.
Pfizer Whistleblower Karen Kingstonrevealed in August, how Graphene Oxide was hidden under a trade secret and that’s why it wasn’t listed in the patents. However Kingston explains, it is in fact the key ingredient in the Covid-19 serums.
Another Chief Scientist for Pfizer blew the whistle in November, leaking internal emails on Stew Peter’s Show from top Pfizer executives and scientists discussing how they were going to hide from the public that Graphene Oxide is in their serums.
In April 2021, Health Canada recalled a million and a half KN95 face masks containing Graphene. Children had been forced to wear these masks in Canadian schools. Health Canada compared wearing them to breathing in asbestos all day long. These poisonous masks came from China’s Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd.
Dr. Robert Young used Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy which revealed Graphene Oxide in four Covid-19 trade marked serums, September 11, 2021.
Dr. Antonietta Gatti did a recent video interview on the toxicity of Graphene Oxide Nanometallic particulates to cells. She has found them in the “vaccines”, PCR kits and face masks.
In her groundbreaking 2017 report with Dr. Stefano Montanari, Dr. Antoinetta Gatti explains Nanoparticles inside cells destroy the innate defense mechanism of cells and cause blood clots, deadly inflammation, thrombi, and multi-organ failure posed by nanometallic particulates, which are non-biodegradable and indeed biopersistent. They can both enter cells, harm DNA, and be carried by the blood to bind with organic matter and coagulate in organs.
A Slovakian team analyzed PCR kit nasal swabs using SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in a hospital laboratory from Bratislava. The team found that when DARPA’s Graphene Oxide Hydrogels come in contact with organic fluid (e.g., saliva) within a few minutes they begin to form rectangular crystal structures. These gradually grow in a fractal manner. A German research team also filmed the crystalline growth of the GO Hydrogels.
Science Papers and Patents
Several scientific papers show that Graphene Oxide is being used in gene therapy as a scaffold or platform for the delivery of mRNA into cells by way of its high electrical conductivity and ability to permeate cell membranes. The crystalline networks form in bodily fluid and replicate after injection and in the serum itself, as shown in this video of the Pfizer serum. It sure does look like nano high frequency antennas.
Scientists have developed a novel way of making carbon nanotubes at the NanoScience Center of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland, and at Harvard University, in the US.
Graphene was part of the first human genome project initiated in 2001. mRNA gene therapy Nanotech using Graphene Oxide as a vector, runs on CRISPR technology and it was developed by Pfizer,Moderna, and BioNTech, as a treatment for sick cancer patients. Due to its cytotoxicity (cell death) in healthy cells and the fact that all the animals died in the animal trials, Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology was never approved for use on Humans! Why is this technology now being used on healthy people and on children, who are at no risk of COVID?
It should be quite clear to everyone by now that the pharmaceutical cartel is using this technology worldwide, in illegal Human trials and trying to mandate their poisonous “vaccines” on everyone, with impunity.
Nanografi is manufacturing Graphene OxideNanotubes and intranasal vaccinesfor Covid-19 drug delivery.
If you’re still not convinced, here’s a main stream media article trying to pitch Graphene Oxide “flu vaccine” nasal spray as some kind of protective intervention.
Dr. Chunhong Dong is lead author of a study from the Institute for Biomedical Sciences in China where he boasts,
“This study gives new insights into developing high performance intranasal vaccine systems with two-dimensional sheet-like nanoparticles.”
Graphene Oxide has been carefully engineered as a “vaccine adjuvant for immunotherapy” and Polyethylene glycol (PEG), another highly toxic poison, is used as coating polymers. PEGs are widely used as additives in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food. But PEGs come with potential life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis.
This is not a big name brand but they do mention “Carbon graphene loaded nano particles and micro-particles” in their Sars-Cov2 patent invention.
Here’s a list of peer reviewed medical studies on Graphene Oxide Toxicity and how it coagulates the blood. How much more evidence do you need to BELIEVE?
Dr. Armin Koroknay, Research director of Private Consultants and Research Institute of Zürich, analyzed the effects of COVID “Vaccination” on Blood.
Click here to watch the video.
Dr. Bärbel Ghitalla and her team put different brands under a microscope and found things they could not explain, but are explained in the “Covid-19 vaccine” patents.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. … less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. (emphasis added)
This Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure provides data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).
In a twisted irony, the data revealed in this “insider report” refutes the official vaccine narrative peddled by the governments and the WHO. It also confirms the analysis of numerous medical doctors and scientists who have revealed the devastating consequences of the mRNA “vaccine”.
What is contained in Pfizer’s “confidential” report is detailed evidence on the impacts of the “vaccine” on mortality and morbidity. This data which emanates from the “Horse’s Mouth” can now be used to confront as well formulate legal procedures against Big Pharma, the governments, the WHO and the media.
In a Court of Law, the evidence contained in this Big Pharma confidential report (coupled with the data on deaths and adverse events compiled by the national authorities in the EU, UK and US) is irrefutable: because it is their data and their estimates and not ours.
Bear in mind: it’s data which is based on reported and recorded cases, which constitute a small percentage of the actual number of vaccine related deaths and adverse events.
This is a de facto Mea Culpa on the part of Pfizer. #Yes it is a Killer Vaccine
Pfizer was fully aware that the mRNA vaccine which it is marketing Worldwide would result in a wave of mortality and morbidity. This is tantamount to a crime against humanity on the part of Big Pharma.
Pfizer knew from the outset that it was a killer vaccine.
It is also a Mea Culpa and Treason on the part of corrupt national governments Worldwide which are being threatened and bribed by Big Pharma.
No attempt has been made by the governments to call for the withdrawal of the killer vaccine.
People are told that the vaccine is intended to save lives.
Council gives green light to start negotiations on international pandemic treaty
On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
The intergovernmental negotiating body, tasked with drafting and negotiating this international instrument, will hold its next meeting by 1 August 2022, to discuss progress on a working draft. It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.
……A convention, agreement or other international instrument is legally binding under international law. An agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response adopted under the World Health Organization (WHO) would enable countries around the globe to strengthen national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics.
My adult son and I tested positive for Covid-19 at the same time. For about a week we felt relatively fine, but suddenly absolute exhaustion set in. His oxygen levels were quite low, so he decided to go to the hospital. I stayed home to recover under the care of my daughter. A few days after he had arrived at the hospital, he requested to be treated with the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) Math+ Hospital Treatment Protocol
The doctors refused. His sister wrote a letter also requesting Math+, along with all of the literature. She offered to sign a liability waver. They again refused.
For the first few days my son was alert and talking. They did not allow my daughter into the room to speak with him; short cell-phone contact only. This made it impossible to discuss what the doctors were planning. Later, when he was in a coma and on the ventilator, we were allowed into his room every day.
Without informed consent, they immediately placed my son on “the usual hospital COVID protocol”, as directed by Dr. Bonnie Henry. Right away the doctors put him on nineteen medications (19), many of which have side effects of trouble breathing, anxiety, confusion, mental depression, etc. In this “cocktail” they included Dexamethasone and Baricitinib. (The FDA has not approved Baricitinib for Covid; it is designated “for emergency use only”.) In addition, some of the drugs they gave him were opioids—but they also gave him drugs for which opioids are contraindicated. (Note: There is no valid study about this combination of drugs. No one can say what such a combination of 19 drugs does to a body.)
It includes Remdesivir (a drug proven to cause kidney failure), but prohibits Ivermectin, one of the safest drugs known, and warns against “unproven or ineffective therapies” such as Dexamethasone as well as vitamins D, C, and Aspirin. It does not warn against an unproven combination of drugs such as the nineteen medications given my son immediately upon arrival at the hospital. The Status states that doctors must abide by the “public health system”, and includes the following: “The Ivermectin/Math+ Protocol has been developed by experienced physicians treating hospitalized Covid-19 patients; at this time, it has not been adopted as a medical consensus.”
I phoned a doctor who had previously prescribed Ivermectin. She said she would get her hands chopped off if she did that now. The BC College of Physicians and Surgeons had instructed pharmacies that they are no longer allowed to fill prescriptions of Ivermectin. The doctors transferred my son to the ICU. Six days after arrival at the hospital, after they had administered “the cocktail”, which included Dexamethasone and Baricinitib, they intubated him (a mechanical ventilator down his throat). Their own report states that he was still requesting Math+, but again the doctors proceeded with Dr. Bonnie Henry’s approved hospital protocol—again without his informed consent. Midazolam was later added, a commonly used drug in palliative care.
They put him into a medically-induced coma with three heavy IV (intravenous) drugs: Fentanyl, Ketamine, Rocuronium. The doctors continued with the unproved “cocktail”, as well as many other drugs; they included minimal doses of a few vitamins.
I wrote a letter to a director of the hospital and to all six of the rotating treating doctors. In my letter I begged them: 2 “To you, who is familiar with the face of death in hospitals, my son’s death would be just another COVID-19 statistic. To me, the mother, it will be the death of my only son…I request that you IMMEDIATELY implement the Math+ Protocol to aid in his recovery…I ask you, if your son’s or daughter’s condition was deteriorating after 12 days of your “approved hospital protocol treatment for Covid-19”, would you not at least TRY the harmless and evidence-based Math+ Protocol?” I pleaded with them to not let my son die. I enclosed a liability waiver—all to no avail.
In response to my letter, the Director of Clinical Operations phoned and once again quoted Dr. Bonnie Henry’s iron-clad hospital protocol. We wrote to the doctors a total of six times. I reminded them of their Hippocratic Oath, “First do no harm”—that by refusing to use evidence-based, life-saving treatments they are doing harm. Our pleas fell on deaf ears. In a last-ditch effort we requested my son be treated with high dose vitamin C, as recommended by the Math+ protocol: “If in ICU and not improving: Consider Mega-Doses [of vitamin C]: 25 grams [25,000 milligrams] IV twice daily for 3 days”.
The doctors even refused to try the safe, effective, and harmless vitamin C. The six rotating doctors kept us in the dark; they refused to speak to us. In fact, they avoided us. The nurses gave us bits of incidental information to keep us placated. On the last day, a doctor admitted that he was “kind of a soldier on the ground…I have absolutely no power…”. When they told his sister that her brother would likely have to go on a ventilator, she again wrote a letter requesting the Math+ hospital treatment protocol, together with the relevant literature; the doctor crossed his arms and refused to take the letter. She then handed it to the nurse and asked it be put into the file.
My son was kept on a mechanical ventilator and in a medically induced coma for 21 days. The doctors had also been giving him blood pressure medication that apparently had kept his heart beating. We were asked to agree to stop this heart medication so that he could finally die. The hospital report states that my son had no comorbid conditions. His family doctor once remarked that he had above normal health.
The doctor’s report states that he died of Covid-19 pneumonia and complications of multiple organ failure. His entire body was swollen. A nurse commented, “Everyone in here gets puffy”. I held my son’s hand as he lay dying—a bloated piece of yellow rubber. My daughter and I had visited a seemingly dead body on a daily basis. It was heartbreaking.
#2. As for myself, after testing positive, I felt fine for about a week, then suddenly became so exhausted that I could not even lift my arm. My daughter drove up from out of town. She immediately phoned the Canadian Covid Care Alliance https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/treatment-protocols/who also uses Math+.
My daughter phoned Canadian Covid TeleHealth; they provide medical advice across Canada http://www.covidtelehealth.ca. They referred me to Dr. Ira Bernstein. He consulted with me by phone, then faxed a prescription to a local pharmacy: Nitazoxanide, Prednisone, and Azithromycin. After two weeks, with use of these medications, a few days of minimal supplemental oxygen, and liberal use of vitamin C—and under my daughter’s care—I was fully recovered. I am 80 years old and pre-diabetic. The doctor who saved my life is now in danger of losing his license. He is therefore no longer treating patients suffering from Covid-19. What a loss.
My son was a photojournalist; children and animals loved him. For my daughter and I there will be no more birthdays and Christmases. Without my son, my golden years are golden no more.
3. I have written this story in the hope that the information presented will save lives. (Names withheld.)
***** One must ask: Why are our governments and health authorities not providing its citizens with information regarding prevention and effective early treatment?
Why are the FLCCC’s safe, treatments forbidden? Why are Baricinitib and Remdesivir still being used? American Front Line Nurses are vehemently against these. Early treatment would save lives. It would also prevent the strain on hospitals, doctors, and nurses; it would stop ruining our economy, businesses, and families. If we were all provided with information about prevention and care before Covid gets out of hand (turning blue and shortness of breath), we could live with this virus like we live with the flu.
Early treatment is—and has always been—the solution. In some countries the government distributes home care kits to its citizens. My son’s story is the story of thousands of people across the country. It is not an isolated incident. To date (February 27, 2022) there have been 2,851 Covid deaths in BC. Our governments are suppressing life-saving treatments. Hospital directors, doctors, and nurses are “just following orders”: Dr. Bonnie Henry’s protocol, as dictated by the BC CDC.
Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 10, 2020 1:38 PM, REMOVED <REMOVED> wrote:
I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).
I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.
The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:
– Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020. – Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020. – Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020. – Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021 – Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021. – Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021. – Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021. – Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021. – Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021. – Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021. – Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.
Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) .
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.
So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.
All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.
I am directed to walk where they draw the line, paste the X, align the arrow: one way. I am made to stand in line, six feet from the customer before and after. Some businesses, public services, and all health care providers demand a mask.
I am being conditioned: the business is in charge. Conditioned to being controlled. To being herded. Others are in control of my every move.
Plexiglass barriers at every check-out announce separation and fear; make communication difficult. With the mask on the employee, hearing is frustrated, decimated.
The restaurant insists on taking my name, phone number or email. Many strangers have my personal information. My life is directed and controlled every time I step from my self-isolation—from what used to be my home, my refuge, into what used to be my community, my city.
Now the basic conditioning is in place, but people insist on taking back their freedom. Getting back to normal. Now reinforcing that conditioning is essential. New threats are added to those infants. So the spin spins. Claims of scientific unity contradict many independent scientists; but fear wins out. The ‘new normal’ is constant terror.
Internet heavily censored; cell phone conversations recorded. Facebook, Twitter, and other formerly beneficial means of communication, know all about us. Report to the controlling elite.
We are owned, in our most personal lives, by corporations and the politicians who bow and scrape for their own enrichment.
The UN One World Government at last exposes itself as dictatorship—with a global depopulation agenda. Who dies of covid-19? Elders, the sick, poor, black, indigenous people—disadvantaged victims of our system, seen as the ‘drain’ on world resources. ‘Culling’ the global population, our world government re-ignites criminal eugenics.
Dr. Bertell in her Letter to the UN Commission on Biodiversity, 2011 (the year before she died):
“There are fewer unknowns and/or dangerous consequences connected with converting our addiction to fossil fuels into developing more benign energy technologies, than there is in manipulation of a delicately balanced earth system with the potentially widespread and irreversible consequences of interruption of the natural interaction between the oceans and the sun, the ionosphere and the magnetosphere!
We already have a wealth of experience, beginning with attempts at weather control with cloud seeding in 1950, and 50 decades of military experiments designed to assure “full spectrum dominance” by 2020”.
On 30 May 2000, General Henry H. Shelton, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, released the military’s vision for the year 2020. The press release stated:
‘The overarching focus of JV2020 remains a joint force capable of full spectrum dominance…pre-eminent in any form of conflict. Four operational concepts – dominant maneuver, precision engagement, focused logistics, and full dimensional protection – continue as the foundation of JV2020.’
What emerges from the new military planning is that information technology will be key in the development of future warfare. The US will be able to conduct attacks on foreign computer networks while defending its own system against attack. Strikes will include using deception to ‘defend decision-making processes by neutralizing an adversary’s perception management and intelligence collection efforts’. Faced with such obscure language, the lay reader can only speculate as to what this might entail. The press release concluded that information warfare will become as important as that ‘conducted in the domains of land, air and space’. China’s military also has stated that it intends to make information warfare a capability equal in stature to its army, navy and air forces.
[FN: ‘Pentagon Envisions Cyber-warfare Rise’, Washington Times, 31 May 2000]
The need for sophisticated early-warning systems and intelligence sources is part of this overall plan for ‘dominance’ and an integrated system of defence.”
Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War (Pages 102,3)
Billions of people have energized the transition to sustainable practice for decades; billions have worked for peace for centuries. Our struggle to “reinvent” both civilian and military economies escalates along with our planet crises.
So the renewed call for a Green New Deal, energizing new citizen activists, is welcome and necessary. Including the dispossessed in the remake of our economies to sustainable standards, addressing social and economic problems, is essential for survival.
Does it matter whether corporate foundations finance the Green New Deal and other climate action groups? Only if it also serves the hidden agenda. How to detect that? By the results. How many groups include war as a cause of climate change?
The UN IPCC does not. Our world government reports only on the impacts of the civilian economy. That policy was decided 22 years ago by US corporate and military lobby; the UN is still giving us only half the picture in their most recent Reports. It looks like most climate action groups follow this ‘lead’.
By this result, it’s clear that the corporate-military agenda directs and limits public attention to the civilian economy. Why? They want no limits to growth on war.
Since our taxes pay for all their war industries, public opinion must accept escalating military spending, source of their obscene wealth. Corporations get tax deductions as non-profit foundations; again they use public money to shape society to their interests, while posing as humanitarian philanthropists sharing their wealth, earned by hard work and smart investment in Business As Usual. They make money every step of the way. And since the military always gets the billions the need to keep us ‘secure’, and since war needs oil, the net effect of the hidden agenda is to maintain fossil industries for war: state-sanctioned mass murder for global domination and depopulation.
It’s a shocking, unbelievable picture. No citizen would knowingly support this.
Should we then denounce the GND (which many do for various reasons) as a possible Trojan Horse for the military-industrial dominators? I see the good work and the corporate manipulation existing at the same time. Both are part of the complexity of interconnected civilian and military economies and politics, now polarized.
That polarity defines the work we need to do: bring war as one more cause of climate crisis to public attention, to balance public perception and illuminate new paths to change.